|
04-7-74 BlaLead2 |
|
|
Leading
Strategic Change Breaking
Through the Brain Barrier J. Stewart Black and Hal B. Gregersen Prentice
Hall, 2002, 188 pp. ISBN 0-13-046108-3 |
|
Black is professor of business administration
at the University of Michigan. Gregersen is professor of global leadership at Brigham
Young University. The principles are
simple and well illustrated in the arena of corporate growth. Someone said they thought it was the best
book on leading change. Ch
1. The
Challenge of Leading Strategic Change
“Lasting success lies in changing
individuals first; then the organization follows. An organization changes only as far or as
fast as its collective individuals change.”
“Instead of an organization in approach, we take an individual
out approach. To repeat—to
strategically change your organization, you must first change individuals.”
(2) “Change has never been easy.” “Humans are biologically hard-wired to
resist change.” (3) “The faster a leader tries to force change,
the more shock waves of resistance compact together, forming a massive
barrier to success.” “Leaders confront
a ‘brain barrier’ composed of preexisting and successful mental maps.” (6)
“Map Makers of change must comprehend, break through, and ultimately
redraw individual mental maps, one by one, person by person, again and
again.” (8) Change fails because:
The fundamental process or cycle of change:
“ Stage 1: Do the
right thing and do it well. Stage 2: Discover
that the right thing is now the wrong thing. Stage 3: Do the
new right thing, but do it poorly at first. Stage 4:
Eventually do the new right thing well.” (13) Ch
2.
Brain Barrier #1: Failure to See
“If people fail to see the need for change,
they will not change.” (20) We ignore
the evidence “because we are blinded…by the light of what we already see,…a history of success.” (21) People have existing mental maps. They have worked and they continue to
work. The old dog has difficulty
unlearning old tricks. Some are successful
even though their maps are mistaken or distorted. “Just because a map works does not mean
that it accurately reflects all the terrain.”
As long as you don’t venture outside your area of focus, it may work
fairly well. Since the map works at
home, you tend to stay at home! Even
as the map begins to appear wrong, there is great pressure to respond by
doing what you know to do. (32) The longer the map works, the more
difficult it is to change. (41) Ch
3. The Keys to Seeing: Contrast and
Confrontation
In complex organizational settings, people
can selectively focus on elements from the past and present that are similar
and ignore key contrasts. We can be
blind to the “obvious” differences.
“Leaders have to confront their people with the key contrasts between
the past, present, and future.” (47) “Leaders have to simplify and focus on the
key differences.” (51) Cut to the
core. What are the core contrasts
between the past and the future? (52)
Ratchet up contrast. Use simple
visuals. (53) A key mistake is to present the contrast
only once and think people will “get it.” (50) “Present the contrasts repeatedly so
employees don’t view them as ‘one-time passing parades’ that they can simply
wait out.” (55) Create an inescapable experience. Put people directly in front of the most
important and forceful aspects of the contrast.” (56-7) Summary: “
Ch
4.
Brain Barrier #2: Failure to Move
Even if we see that the old no longer
works, we don’t move if the new map with its destination and path is not
clear. (68) “Quite often the clearer the new
vision, the more immobilized employees become.” “People recognize that they cannot go
directly…to doing the new right thing well.
They understand that they will go from doing the wrong thing well
to doing the right thing poorly.” “Most of us do not like to be bad at
something, especially if we are already good at something else.” (69-70) Movement is
unlikely until employees plainly see a promising path to competence. (73) Ch
5. The
Keys to Moving: Destinations, Resources, and Rewards
Helping others believe they can get there
requires:
“If the direction and destination are not
clear, your motivation to move forward is nil.” “Often leaders think the new right thing is
crystal clear but subordinates report …a fog.” (77)
“Ask your people directly and indirectly to describe (or literally
draw) each key element of the new map.” (78)
Ask them to speculate about its possible implications. (79) Find out whether they believe they have the
required resources and provide any missing.
Employees ask themselves, “If I try, can I do it?” If the answer is no, they won’t move. (81) Be sure the reward for moving is motivating
to each individual. (85) People must see in their own minds (not
yours) where they are going. They must
believe they have the required resources to get there and that outcomes they
value will result. (87) Ch
6. Brain Barrier #3: Failure to Finish
The full benefit of “organizational” change
cannot be realized until the majority of “individuals” change. “Quite simply, new transformational
strategies do not make a difference until people think and act
differently.” People fail to finish
because they get tired or they get lost.
(91) “Proximate” factors, such as the boss’s example,
reinforcement from peers and punishment from customers, drive behaviors more
than “remote” factors such as organizational strategy, structure, or even
compensation. (93) Employees, walking in the proven paths,
resist changes based on whims. They
stick with what works. “If you are
trying to get employees to think and behave differently, their willingness
initially to walk by faith is a function of how much they trust you.” (94) Workers are smart. They look for reward vs. effort of what
they do now compared to the anticipated new. (96) Ch. 7. The Keys to Finishing: Champions and
Charting
“The champion is needed next to the action
when it happens.” Senior executives
“need to manifest their support by ensuring that there are champions of the change
at the point and time in which the early walks by faith occur.” (107) “They must know what to look for and what
to reinforce.” “Initially, you are
looking for efforts.” “Unless you stay
close to the action initially, the natural and likely negative results can
easily kill the desired behavior.” (108) “When it comes to measuring progress, it
needs to be done both at the executive suite and in the trenches.” Performance, good and bad, needs to be
communicated. Otherwise the worker
imagines the worst. (109) “Achieving success also requires monitoring
and communicating at the individual level.” (110) Ch
8. Breakthrough Innovation and Growth
The biggest obstacle to greater growth is
often getting employees to see new opportunities. (114)
They work in a box of existing products (vertical side) and existing
customers (lateral side) and this world looks big. But you can make this box one corner of
four boxes where the three new ones are new products, new customers and new
products and customers. Now
your box looks smaller and opportunity looks bigger. You can add four more boxes by going three
dimensional and adding new approaches as another axis. The author illustrates with corporate
examples. Ch
9. Leading Strategic Change Toolkit:
Conceiving
[This begins a practical section of
providing tools to help individuals conceive, move, and finish.] “Andy Grove, Chairman of the Board at
Intel, was once asked how he found time as a senior executive to train
leaders at Intel’s supervisory development programs. His instant quip was, ‘Where can I get more
leverage in shaping the future of Intel?’”
Jack Welch said, “When you retire, you won’t remember what you did in
the first quarter of last year, or the third.
You’ll remember how many people you developed….” (136) “When you’re confused about how you’re
doing as a leader, find out how the people you lead are doing.” (136) “If you want others to change, you need to
demonstrate your own willingness and ability to change.” “The most effective value-adding leaders
teach others what they know and how to do it.” (137) “We have rarely seen a ratio greater than
one change leader to 100 individuals result in significant, lasting strategic
change.” (138) “A high dose of inquisitiveness enhances a
person’s willingness and ability to change.” Questions for your IQ (inquisitiveness
index): (141-42)
To boost your inquisitiveness, reconfigure
personal routines. (145) Look for contrasts in the following core
areas: customers, competition, technology, products and services. (147) Ch. 10. Leading Strategic Change Toolkit: Believing
“The key practical step in establishing
effective targets is translating the vision of the new right thing into
concrete behaviors.” (154) Ch. 11. Leading
Strategic Change Toolkit: Achieving
Identify in advance likely negative
consequences for less than ideal proficiency in the new behaviors. Make explicit what actions change champions
should take when people exhibit the right behaviors but do not get the
desired consequences. (166-67) One must systematically assess required
capabilities, current capabilities, resulting gaps, and needed bridging
actions to get breakthrough change.
(168) To set up a monitoring and charting
process:
Decide who will receive the
information. Employees never feel that
too many people are getting the information on how things are
progressing. (172-73) Ch. 12. Getting
Ahead of the Change Curve
Three kinds of change: anticipatory,
reactive, crisis. To initiate change
when the signs and signals indicating its need are far off is the most
difficult. Crisis change is the
easiest to initiate and lead but the most costly for nearly everyone
affected. Anticipatory change is where
the potential payoffs are the biggest.
(178-87) Core conviction: “By changing individuals, we change organizations.”
(188) Further best reading on leading change: Leading Change, John P. Kotter,
Harvard Business School Press, 1996. Leading Change,
James O’Toole, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1995 See also: Better Change, Best Practices for Transforming Your Organization, Price
Waterhouse Change Integration Team Managing Transitions, William Bridges, |
||
|
||